HomeResources › Quote Comparison

Procurement · Engineering · Supplier selection

CNC Machining Quote Comparison Worksheet

Normalize three machining quotes to the same technical and commercial baseline, total the included costs, gate non-negotiable requirements, and score the remaining tradeoffs using your own priorities.

A low unit price may be a different offer rather than a better price. Quantity, revision, material condition, finish, inspection, documentation, freight, lead-time start, tooling, and release commitments can all change what a supplier actually priced.

Normalize first. Gate second. Score last. A weighted score cannot rescue a quote that misses a mandatory drawing revision, certification, approved process, controlled-data requirement, delivery need, or quality flow-down.
Private by design: entries stay in this browser page only. This worksheet does not save, transmit, or add supplier data to analytics. Print or save a PDF before leaving if you need a record.

1. Confirm all suppliers quoted the same job

Write the governing requirement in the baseline column. Use the supplier columns to record what each quote actually includes. Resolve every mismatch before comparing price.

Scope fieldRequired baselineSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Model and drawing revision
Release quantity and annual usage
Material specification, grade, condition and source
Finish and special processes
Critical features, tolerances and inspection
FAI, reports, certifications and traceability
Delivery date, ship-to and clock-start event
Packaging, freight and delivery terms
Quote validity, payment and escalation terms

2. Normalize total commercial cost

Enter extended U.S. dollar amounts on the same release-quantity basis. Use zero only when the quote explicitly includes the item at no additional charge; leave unknown items blank and resolve them.

Cost at normalized scopeSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Machining price at normalized release quantity
Programming, setup or nonrecurring engineering
Tooling, fixtures and dedicated gages
Material surcharge, minimum or buyer-furnished impact
Outside processing and finish
Inspection, FAI and documentation
Packaging and freight
Expedite, launch or recovery charges
Blanket-order, inventory or release fees
Total entered commercial cost
Keep unsupported risk dollars out of the total. Do not add invented defect, delay, or disruption costs to favor a supplier. Score schedule, capability, quality, and continuity separately unless your organization has a documented cost model.

3. Gate the non-negotiable requirements

Define the evidence required for each must-have. Check a supplier only after the evidence meets the acceptance rule. A failed mandatory gate is an exception to resolve, not a low score to average away.

Must-have gateEvidence / acceptance ruleSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Drawing and specification scope
Process and equipment fit
Quality or customer approval
Documentation and traceability
Delivery requirement
Cybersecurity and controlled-data path
Commercial or contract term

4. Score the viable suppliers on your priorities

Assign weights that total 100%. Score each viable supplier from 1 (weak) to 5 (strong) using documented evidence. Zero-weight criteria may be left blank. The calculator shows a weighted score only when the weights equal 100% and every weighted criterion has a valid score.

Weight total: 0% — must equal 100%
CriterionEvidence to scoreWeight %Supplier A
1–5
Supplier B
1–5
Supplier C
1–5
Total evaluated costNormalized entered cost and unresolved exclusions
Schedule confidenceVerified milestones, dependencies, capacity review and recovery path
Capability and process fitRouting, feature risk, inspection access and open technical questions
Quality and documentation fitConfirmed inspection, FAI, certifications, traceability and sub-tier controls
Repeat-program and release fitFirm window, setup amortization, commitments, inventory and reschedule terms
Continuity and recoveryMaterial, sub-tier, capacity, business-continuity and corrective-action evidence
Commercial clarity and responseExplicit assumptions, exclusions, ownership and useful decision support
Weighted score — only after mandatory gates pass

5. Pressure-test schedule and repeat-program assumptions

Schedule questions

  • When does quoted lead time start: PO, order acknowledgment, approved drawing, material receipt, deposit, or another event?
  • Is material available, allocated, or only assumed?
  • Which outside processes and inspection steps sit on the critical path?
  • What buyer inputs must arrive before each milestone?
  • What changes if the release is expedited, delayed, or revised?

Repeat-program questions

  • Which demand is forecast, firm, or cancelable?
  • How is setup amortized across releases?
  • Who owns material, fixtures, tooling and dedicated gages?
  • What inventory, minimum order and reschedule boundaries apply?
  • When may price change for material, volume, scope or schedule?

6. Record the award logic

A score supports judgment; it does not replace the buyer's approved-supplier procedure, technical review, legal review, or contract authority.

Red flags before purchase order release

Ask Procut-CNC to quote the same baseline

Send the released model and drawing, normalized quantity and annual demand, material, required delivery, quality flow-downs, and main award driver. Do not upload another supplier's confidential quote unless you have authority to share it. State the comparable scope and commercial objective instead.

Procut-CNC will confirm process fit, assumptions, exclusions, priced tradeoffs, documentation scope, and available capacity before making a commercial commitment.

CallGet a Quote